2. POLARITY
1) although anthropomorphic figures may be used (as archetypal images), we do not understand either the Goddess or the God as Beings, but rather as the collective attributes/aggregates/qualities of the two polaric extents of the Divine Wholism. We consider these attributes more in a metaphysical context, than a deific context.
2) we recognize that it is possible that other living worlds may operate on a basic principle other than Polarity (Gaian humyns are biased towards the principle of polarity because of their polaric genderization); but as ours is, we continue to explore what the Universe, based on Polarity, means scientifically, psychologically, spiritually, etc.
3) some of the basic divisions (biases) within Polarity are i) gatheredness and separateness; ii) space and time; iii) context and focus; iv) content and directed activity.
In general, the Goddess primarily represents the principle of all aspects of gathered-ness, space, context and content: the God, all aspects of separateness, time, focus and directed activity. However, within Polarity, neither is passive or negative, in the usual sense. Both are 'active' at all times for example, gatheredness is active 'drawing into a gatheredness' (i.e. if the force of 'drawing in' weren't constant active, all gathered would separate): context is the action of maintaining a particular set of qualities or circumstances, which moulds and influences any focus because humyns focus their attention on 'focus', they tend to not acknowledge the 'activity' of context.
Neither is 'separateness' considered negative (as is often the case in our culture) separateness is a necessary attribute by which 'things' come into 'be~ing' as specific things. One could only BE some~thing if one was not being 'some~thing else'. This is a basic principle of ex-pression (pressing out from something therefore, separating) and ex~IS~tense (taken as 'metaphorically literally', means 'out from the wholistic IS into tension' which allows it to move, act, be, become). Furthermore, we recognize that the two are totally interdependent – no thing or act is one or the other, but a particular balance of both.
4) Polarity operates via the whole 'stretching itself' into an operative (though not always actual) separation, thereby causing a tension. If that tension were static, no~thing would ever BE or DO: to BE or DO: the tension must be constantly moving towards a bias or one extent or the other, within an overall balance literally, a zig-zagging (one reason why the serpent is such a strong and positive image in Wicca: its movement is an archetypal symbol of the nature of Polarity in its movement). At times, then, what we refer to as the Goddess nature within ourselves or the workings of the world will be stronger; at other times, the God nature but always interdependent.
5) 'both/and' is a term to describe a state or position taken that incorporates a polaric understandings of any situation, rather than the dualistic 'either-or'. While the zig-zag movement of polaric tension ensures that the balance keeps changing (by which time/space and we change), a 'both/and' position/attitude attempts to integrate as much of both polaric extents as is possible.
For example, we understand all humyns as being representatives/Expressions of both the Goddesses and the God (despite gender biasing), or that each of us is both 'a daughter of the Goddess and a son of the God' in our own way, or as having both soul and spirit.